Choose a pipeline

Choose a pipeline#

Start with the pipeline that most closely matches the hardware, scan geometry and reconstruction goal. Then update its loader paths and processing parameters for the input data. The table below describes the examples on Ready-to-use pipelines; it is guidance rather than a performance ranking.

Starting pipeline

Hardware

Scan or mode

Best starting point for

Main dependencies

FBP3d_tomobar

GPU

180°, analytical

Routine reconstruction with centring and stripe removal

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

titaren_center_pc_FBP3d_resample

GPU

180°, analytical

Phase-correlation centring and downsampled output

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

LPRec3d_tomobar

GPU

180°, analytical

Trying LPRec3d on compatible parallel-beam data

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

FBP3d_tomobar_denoising

GPU

180°, analytical

FBP followed by total-variation denoising

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

FISTA3d_tomobar

GPU

180°, iterative

Noisy or undersampled data where regularisation is useful

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

deg360_paganin_FBP3d_tomobar

GPU

360°, analytical

Overlap finding, conversion to 180° and Paganin filtering

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

deg360_distortion_FBP3d_tomobar

GPU

360°, analytical

Optical-distortion correction before 360° conversion

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

tomopy_gridrec

CPU

180°, analytical

A small CPU run or a system without a CUDA-capable GPU

TomoPy and HTTomolib

Sweep examples

GPU

Parameter search

Comparing centre-of-rotation or Paganin values

HTTomolibGPU, TomoBAR and HTTomolib

Before running an example:

  1. Confirm that its libraries are installed; see Processing libraries.

  2. Replace loader paths or use NXtomo automatic discovery; see Loading data.

  3. Review method parameters against Available methods.

  4. Validate the result with python -m httomo check PIPELINE INPUT.

  5. Use the archives in Versioned downloads for a tagged HTTomo release.

Choose analytical reconstruction for a fast baseline. Iterative reconstruction is more computationally expensive but can be valuable for noisy or incomplete data. Actual speed depends on data dimensions, parameters, hardware, process count and storage, so benchmark representative data rather than relying on a general ranking.